COMPLEMENTARY AND ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE IN REHABILITATION: PART 1

Therapeuric Techniques in Rehabilitation: Body-Oriented Therapies

CranioSacral Therapy
John E. Upledger, DO, OMM (President, Upledger Institute)

CranioSacral Therapy (CST) is a gentle, hands-on method of whole-body evaluation and treatment that may have a positive impact on nearly every system of the body. Whether used alone or with more traditional healthcare methods, it has proven clinically effective in facilitating the body’s ability to self-heal. CST often produces extraordinary results.

CST helps normalize the environment of the craniosacral system, a core physiological body system only recently scientifically defined. The craniosacral system extends from the skull, face, and mouth down to the sacrum and coccyx. It consists of a compartment formed by the dura mater membrane, the cerebrospinal fluid contained within, the systems that regulate the fluid flow, the bones that attach to the membranes, and the joints and sutures that interconnect these bones.

Because the craniosacral system contains the brain, spinal cord, and all related structures, any restrictions or imbalances in the system may directly affect any or all aspects of central nervous system performance. Fortunately, these problems can be detected and corrected by a skilled therapist using simple methods of palpation.

By using about 5 gm of pressure, or roughly the weight of a nickel, the CST practitioner evaluates the system by testing for ease of motion and the rhythm of cerebrospinal fluid pulsing within the membranes. Specific treatment techniques are then used to release restrictions in sutures, fasciae, membranes, and any other tissues that may influence the craniosacral system. The result is an improved internal environment that frees the central nervous system to return to its optimal levels of health and performance.

THE SCIENTIFIC FOUNDATION OF CRANIOSACRAL THERAPY

In its most basic sense the craniosacral system functions as a semi-closed hydraulic system that bathes the brain and spinal cord and their component cells in cerebrospinal fluid pumped rhythmically at a rate of 6 to 12 cycles per minute. To accommodate these pressure changes, the bones of the cranium and sacrum must remain somewhat mobile throughout life. The joints and their sutures do not fully ossify as was once believed. William Sutherland, DO, introduced this premise in the 1930s.

In the mid-1970s, Michigan State University (MSU) asked me to uncover a scientific basis for Dr. Sutherland’s belief. From 1975 through 1983, I was Professor of Biomechanics at MSU’s College of Osteopathic Medicine , where I led a team of anatomists, physiologists, biophysicists, and bioengineers to test and document the influence of the craniosacral system on the body. Together we conducted research—much of it published—that formed the basis for the modality I went on to develop and name CranioSacral Therapy, or CST.

We discovered that corresponding changes occur in dura mater membrane tensions as cerebrospinal fluid volume and pressure rises and falls within the craniosacral system. These changes in turn induce accommodative movements in the bones that attach to the dura mater compartment. When the natural mobility of the dura mater or any of its attached bones is impaired, the function of the craniosacral system and the central nervous system enclosed may be impaired as well.

RESEARCH SUPPORTS THE EXISTENCE AND SIGNIFICANCE OF THE CRANIOSACRAL SYSTEM

Studying bone specimens from live surgical patients ages 7 through 57 years, the MSU team was able to demonstrate definitive potential for movement between the cranial sutures.1-5 Several other studies then laid the foundation for developing a model to explain the mechanism of the craniosacral system.

One important factor contributing to the MSU research was the discovery of what appeared to be fascia hanging from the free border of the falx cerebri on some of the cranium dissections that were performed on both embalmed and unembalmed cadavers. Under the microscope these tissues appeared to be nerve tracts running out of the falx cerebri with brain tissue attached to their free end.

Further research indicated they were components of a nerve impulse / message delivery system between these identified intrasutural nerve receptors and the walls of the ventricles of the brain in which the choroid plexuses were located. This research provided the basis for what our team named the Pressurestat Model, which explains the function of the craniosacral system as a semi-closed hydraulic system (Figure 1-1). Our findings supported those published in Anatomica Humanica6 by Italian Professor Guiseppi Sperino, who noted that cranial sutures fuse before death only under pathological circumstances.

As a springboard toward the clinical application of therapy on the craniosacral system, an interrater reliability study was devised. Twenty-five nursery-school children were examined by two of four examiners on each of 19 parameters. The percentage of agreement varied from 72% to 92%, depending on the examiners and the allowed variance of either 0% or 0.5%.7

Subsequently, this same 19-parameter evaluation protocol was used to examine 203 additional school children. A technician recorded the orally reported data for a statistician, who collected information from each child’s school file and historical data from parent interviews. This information was compared with the craniosacral system examination findings.

The results of these studies showed that the standardized, quantifiable craniosacral system motion examination represents a practical approach to the study of relationships between craniosacral system dysfunctions and a variety of health, behavior, and performance problems.8 Other researchers have done similar studies related to psychiatric disorders9 and symptomatology in newborns.1

CRANIOSACRAL THERAPY ENCOURAGES THE BODY TO SELF-CORRECT

CST is based on the idea that each patient’s body contains the necessary information to uncover the underlying cause of any health problem. The therapist communicates with the body to obtain this information and helps facilitate the patient’s own self-healing processes.

Thus the usual sequence of events carried out in conventional medicine is reversed in a CST session. Rather than taking a verbal patient history, the therapist begins through palpation, that is, touch. If the therapist is familiar with the patient’s history before the session, he or she may find only what is expected rather than sensing the subtle clues offered by the patient’s body, energies, and psyche. For that reason, patients are generally asked to write their medical histories and bring them to the clinic for their files. The therapist can then review the history later when he or she feels safe from the issue of suggestibility.

Although avoiding initial history taking is controversial, CST has been practiced this way successfully by tens of thousands of therapists since these concepts were first taught at MSU in 1976.

CST also diverges from conventional medicine in its approach to symptoms. Rather than trying to simply relieve symptoms, CST practitioners work to find and resolve the primary dysfunction underlying the presenting symptom complex. For instance, rather than seeing strabismus as a diagnosed condition to be corrected by surgery, the therapist searches for a cause within the intracranial membrane system and the motor control system of the eyes. In this case the cause is often found to be an abnormal tension pattern in the tentorium cerebelli. Quite often these tension patterns are referred from the occiput or from the low back and / or the pelvis.

The CST “diagnosis” would be intracranial membranous strain of the tentorium cerebelli due to occipital and / or low back and pelvic dysfunctions resulting in secondary motor dysfunction of the eyes. Clearly in such a case the therapist would focus on the sacrum, pelvis, occiput, and then the tentorium cerebelli. Correct evaluation and treatment would be signified by a “spontaneous correction” of the strabismus.

A similar approach is used for almost any presenting problem, from TMJ disorders to recurrent bronchitis and spastic colitis. The nature of the presenting problem is usually of secondary importance unless immediate amelioration is critical, or if the patient does not understand CST. If this is the case, the therapist may attend to immediate complaints while patient understanding is developing.

How CranioSacral Therapy Differs From Cranial Osteopathy

CST is often compared with cranial osteopathy, which was developed by Dr. William Sutherland, the “father of cranial osteopathy.” Although Dr. Sutherland’s discoveries regarding the flexibility of skull sutures led to the early research behind CST and while both approaches affect the cranium, sacrum, and coccyx, similarities end at this point.

Today, as in the beginning, cranial osteopathy remains focused on the sutures of the skull. However, CST, as developed at MSU, focuses on the dura mater membrane system as the primary cause of dysfunction. The bones of the skull are involved only as they serve as “handles” for the practitioner to use to access and affect the membrane system that attaches to those bones.

Another major difference between the two approaches is in the quality of touch. CST practitioners generally evaluate and often correct imbalances in the system by using a light touch that has been scientifically measured between 5 and 10 gm, which is approximately the weight of a nickel resting in the palm of the hand. CST involves no invasive or directive forces but uses a gentle quality that often belies the effectiveness of the therapy. Most patients say they feel nothing more than subtle sensations during a typical session. In general, the manipulations used in cranial osteopathy are often heavier and more directive.10

PERFORMING THE CRANIOSACRAL EVALUATION

During an initial CST evaluation, the therapist senses subtle motions while looking for any restrictions impeding free motion of the craniosacral system and various body regions, tissues, and organs, as well as the body’s energies (Figures 1-2, Figures 1-3 and Figures 1-4). The whole body responds to the rhythmical activity of the craniosacral system, which is evaluated for amplitude, quality, rate, and symmetry/asymmetry of response. Similar evaluations are conducted on the vascular and respiratory systems. The bodily responses, or lack thereof, to these systemic activities are significant factors in the search for the primary dysfunction.

Another integral part of the initial CST evaluation involves the myofascial system. Fascia runs like a continuous web of tissue throughout the body and remains somewhat mobile under normal circumstances. Gentle traction applied on the fascia in arbitrary directions from various positions helps localize restricted areas. These areas of restricted mobility are then interpreted to be sites of either current problems or residue from previous lesions or problems.

Active lesions / problems are differentiated from inactive residual effects by a technique known as “arcing,” which I developed with biophysicist Zvi Karni at MSU. By using mechano-electrical monitoring, we discovered that energies both within and off the body are palpable to the skilled therapist.12 Arcing requires the therapist to sense the energetic waves of interference produced by the active lesion/problem; these waves tend to be superimposed over the normal subtle physiological motions of the body, organs, tissues, and energies. Practitioners then trace these waves to their source by manually sensing the arcs that they form.12-14

The source of the waves is considered to be the core site of the underlying problem or lesion, which may actually be quite distant from the location of the patient’s symptoms. Usually the active lesion / problem disrupts gross physiological activities, as well as more subtle energy functions and patterns, such as acupuncture meridians.

As sites of dysfunction and disruption are discovered, the therapist may attempt to restore mobility to the involved tissues and energy fields. More often than not these attempts will be partially if not completely successful. In either case the result is often the appearance of a deeper problem or lesion for which the dysfunction just treated has served as an adaptation. The therapist then follows these clues layer by layer until the primary problem is disclosed. This may occur during the first evaluation or it may require more than one visit to bring the deepest underlying problems to the surface. In CST, it is necessary to clear the entire body of any mobility restrictions to achieve the highest level of craniosacral system function.

Most of this evaluation is carried out before the complete evaluation of the craniosacral system itself. Skilled therapists are encouraged to move in and out of the various body systems and regions, including the craniosacral system, as their judgment and intuition suggest. Peripheral body problems often refer into the spinal cord via their nerve root connections. The effect of these referrals on related spinal cord segments includes an effect on the dura mater, which is key to the function of the craniosacral system.

CORRECTING THE FACILITATED SEGMENT

CST includes the concept that the dura mater membrane within the vertebral canal (dural tube) has the freedom to glide up and down within that canal for a range of 0.5 to 2 cm. The slackness and directionality of the dural sleeves allow this movement as they depart the dural tube and attach to the intertransverse foramina of the spinal column.

When nerve roots refer increased levels of impulse activity into the spinal cord from their peripheral domains, a facilitated condition of the related spinal cord segment occurs. A condition of hyperactivity in that facilitated spinal cord segment sends out impulses to the related dural tube and dural sleeves. The result is a tightening and loss of mobility of the dural tube related to the involved segment(s).

Clinical observation suggests CST is effective in releasing dural tube restrictions to normalize the activity of facilitated spinal cord segments. To locate these areas of restricted mobility, the evaluator tests the mobility of the dural tube and releases restrictions as they are found using gentle traction techniques. These releases are mandatory: if a peripheral restriction is released but the dural tube restriction and facilitated spinal cord segment are not, the peripheral problem usually reoccurs.

Once the peripheral body and the dural tube have been treated for restrictions, the therapist can focus on the cranium and sacrum. During this time the therapist also helps correct both primary and secondary dysfunctions of the skull bones, facial bones, hard palate, and sacrococcygeal complex. All related sutures and joints are very gently mobilized through the use of the bones as handles on the dural membranes inside the skull and spinal canal.

After mobilizing bony restrictions, the therapist then focuses on correcting abnormal dural membrane restrictions, irregularities in cerebrospinal fluid activities, and dysfunctional energy patterns and fluctuations related to the craniosacral system. At this stage the patient often moves from a phase of having obstacles removed to one of self-healing with the therapist simply facilitating the process. In essence the patient moves out of the realm of “fighting disease” into one of enhancing health. This self-healing is why CST is such an excellent preventive medicine modality—it mobilizes natural defenses rather than focusing on the etiological agents of disease.

A Case Study
Vertigo in an Olympic Diver

Mary Ellen Clark was a world-class platform diver who had won several major competitions, including a bronze medal in the 1992 Olympic games in Barcelona , Spain . Not one to rest on her accomplishments, she had set her sights on making the 1996 Olympic diving team and bringing home another medal. She was in the best physical shape of her career. In spite of her age (she turned 33 in 1996), experts gave her excellent odds at accomplishing her goal.

Suddenly, Mary Ellen began experiencing vertigo, a condition that had ended the careers of several other divers she knew. Vertigo is a devastating condition for anyone and particularly for a platform diver. Each time Mary Ellen stood at the edge of the diving platform she felt off balance. Once she hit the water, she would become confused and disoriented, occasionally causing her to mistakenly swim to the bottom of the pool.

Mary Ellen saw many doctors and specialists and tried both traditional and unconventional treatment methods to find relief. Yet there seemed to be no solution to her problem. She was unable to train for 9 months because of the devastating effects of the vertigo, and she had all but given up her dream of remaining on the Olympic team.

In September 1995, Mary Ellen came to see me at The Upledger Institute HealthPlex Clinical Services in Palm Beach Gardens , Florida . I started our first session by conducting a whole-body evaluation using my hands to test the mobility of the tissues and areas of restriction throughout her body. I quickly found several significant “energy cysts,” or concentrated areas of foreign, disruptive, or obstructive energies, that likely resulted from traumatic blows to her body. Mary Ellen often did 50 dives a day from the 10-meter platform, and she hit the water at speeds of about 35 miles per hour. I used simple CST techniques to release her energy cysts manually without difficulty.

In the second session the CST evaluation pointed to Mary Ellen’s left knee. She confirmed she had seriously wrenched it during a trampoline accident while practicing a new dive. At the time she paid little attention to the injury; she was accomplished at denying any presence of pain. As the evaluation continued, however, it became clear that the knee injury had caused a chain of compensation through her pelvis and lower back. Her spine had twisted to support her, which in turn caused her head to be improperly positioned on her neck.

As I helped Mary Ellen correct these problems, she began to improve. I continued to see her for at least one session each week for a straightforward combination of CST, knee and spine manipulation, pelvic rebalancing, and myofascial release. Within 30 days of her first treatment, Mary Ellen resumed her physical conditioning. Within 90 days she experienced a complete correction of the problem and was able to return to a full training schedule.

At the Olympic games in Atlanta , in July 1996, Mary Ellen Clark captured another bronze medal.15,16


A Case Study
Intracranial Hemorrhage in a Newborn

Onar Bargior was born prematurely in Moscow , Russia , on February 7, 1991 . He suffered severe cerebral circulation impairment, intracranial hemorrhage, and encephalopathy. He was diagnosed with infantile cerebral paralysis, spastic diplegia, and hypertension-hydrocephalic syndrome. Any stimulation produced muscle spasms that made his legs rigid and scissored, causing hyperextension of his truck and neck. His arms became rigid with clenched fists crossed in front of his body. Having almost no hip flexion, it was difficult for him to assume a sitting position.

In March 1992, Onar was registered as an invalid who could neither stand nor sit without direct assistance. His mother, Maiga, had tried to find help for her only son, yet medical treatment in Russia was limited and sporadic. Onar spent much of his life merely lying on a bed. Then a nonprofit medical relief agency in Waterville , Ohio , the International Services of Hope (ISOH), offered Onar and Maiga hope. ISOH specializes in bringing Third World children to the United States for donated medical treatment not available in their own countries. The organization has had remarkable success in securing life-saving and life-enhancing surgical and medical care for physically impaired or compromised children.

The agency arranged to fly Onar and his mother to New York for treatment at the Division of Pediatric Neurosurgery of New York University’s Medical Center . Their clinical team evaluated Onar in October 1994. However, the doctors determined he was not an appropriate candidate for surgery and the subsequent rehabilitative care because of his extreme spasticity and psychomotor delays. The birth trauma and accompanying cerebral palsy had left his body too rigid to crawl or walk and had severely restricted the use of his right hand.

Onar’s mother’s hopes were shattered. Acutely aware of what this treatment meant to Onar, ISOH began to explore the availability of other medical care. In their investigations a representative consulted with a New York physician who had heard of an innovative program of care available through The Upledger Institute. ISOH contacted the Institute with the plea that the Institute was their “last resort.” The alternative was to return Onar and his mother to Moscow without assistance.

The Upledger Institute accepted Onar into a 2-week intensive therapy program beginning March 13, 1995 . This specialized treatment program is built around the use of CST complemented by physical therapy, Visceral Manipulation, acupuncture, massage therapy, play therapy, family counseling, and education. Onar’s therapists consisted of a multidisciplinary team of physical therapists, occupational therapists, massage therapists, osteopathic physicians, and psychologists.

During Onar’s first session, one of his therapists found severe restrictions in his dural membrane system—the falx cerebri, falx cerebelli, and tentorium cerebelli membranes inside the skull and the dural tube inside the spinal canal. She also found a compression of the sphenobasilar synchondrosis with a right sheer, ethmoid / frontal restriction with bilateral maxillary impaction and restrictions in the right temporoparietal suture, as well as the coronal suture. There were fascial restrictions in the cervical area relating to the hyoid bone, the sterno- cleidomastoid, and the suboccipital triangle muscles. The thoracic inlet and entire rib cage was restricted and rigid. There were also respiratory diaphragm restrictions with a visceral component into the stomach, and pelvic diaphragm restrictions with compression at the L5-S1 vertebral juncture. Treatment was applied to all of these areas.

On the second day of treatment, Maiga reported that Onar had slept soundly, which was an unexpected and pleasant surprise, since he normally woke three or four times a night. On awakening in the morning, he asked when he would be returning to the clinic. Throughout the program, Onar continued to show tremendous daily improvement, including an increased appetite, decreased spasticity, awakening without crying each morning, and increased range of movement of all joints.

Originally, the staff in Moscow and New York described Onar’s psychomotor delays as so pronounced as to indicate mental retardation. Consequently, we were expecting a child slow to respond, both interpersonally and intellectually. What we found was quite the contrary. He impressed us from the beginning with his ability to communicate—initially through smiles, laughter, and emotional engagement. As he became more comfortable he began reacting in his native language, which was peppered with growing numbers of English words and phrases.

Coming into the program, Onar preferred to move by logrolling across the floor. The day he struggled to push himself up on his knees was another great milestone. He also began reaching for toys, and he developed the skills needed to play with stickers, little cars, and trucks.

The intensity of these programs and the systemic nature of the therapy they provide usually results in physiological gains continuing for several months after the program has ended. Because CST removes the restrictions that prohibit the body’s natural inclination toward health, the body experiences a period of reorganization. Encouraged by such remarkable gains in Onar after just one treatment program, our staff decided to provide a second 2-week intensive treatment program after a 2-week period of rest.

The second treatment program began on April 10, 1995 . To the delight of all involved, Onar demonstrated continued gains of physiological movement and decreased spasticity. On the second day of the program, when asked, “How are you today, Onar?” he answered in English:I feel soft.” On the fourth day of the program he was able to place his feet flat on the floor. By the end of the program he was crawling on all fours.

One of our physical therapists noted that, after the second 2-week session, Onar was using his right hand to reach and grasp objects with relative ease and accuracy. With minimal to moderate assistance, he was able to get into sitting, kneeling and high-kneeling positions. He had not been able to perform any of these developmental gross motor movements before coming to the United States. Overall, his contracted musculature or spasticity had greatly relaxed.

When Onar first came to the clinic, his entire cranial system was extremely restricted and compromised. By the end of his second intensive-treatment program his cranial system was moving with greater amplitude and symmetry. This indicated that Onar’s system was operating more efficiently and fluidly without many restrictions in and around his central nervous system. In time Onar was able to sit for longer periods, crawl with reciprocal movement, crawl in high kneeling position with moderate assistance, and use his right hand without verbal prompting. He also began speaking more clearly and displaying a clarity of emotion and projection of love—traits most healthy children display.

By the time Onar completed his treatment programs he had also finished the necessary testing and inoculations to begin attending school. Maiga had worried that Onar might not be intelligent enough to get along in the world. But school testing showed that Onar has a fine mind. With opportunities for education, there is no telling what this child will do. He has already contributed in a profound way to the lives of his therapists and friends.17,18

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF CRANIOSACRAL THERAPY

CST is well known for its multiple applications and positive results in thousands of cases like those of Mary Ellen and Onar. By facilitating and enhancing the body’s self-corrective mechanisms, it has proved useful as both a primary and adjunctive treatment modality for a wide variety of dysfunctions, from coronary insufficiency to Crohn’s disease.

The number of sessions required to achieve results depends on the complexity of the adaptive layers, patient defense mechanisms, and other factors. After an initial hands-on evaluation is conducted, a recommendation can be made. In general, if there is no change in condition after five or six sessions, CST may not be effective for that individual.

Following is a partial list of condition types that have shown response to CST in clinical applications. While research conducted at MSU proved the existence of the craniosacral system and its effect on health and disease, this information is based primarily on clinical observations over the last 15 years of practicing CST. Although no formal outcome studies have been conducted, thousands of patients have reported their results to us, and what is noted here are observations of clear and compelling results and trends.

Chronic Pain Syndromes

Arthritis: Degenerative and Inflammatory
CST enhances fluid motion, releases muscle tonus and desensitizes facilitated segments, all of which contribute to joint rejuvenation. Excellent responses have been reported, including some results that have shown normalized blood studies.

Headache Syndromes
CST is excellent at identifying and treating a wide variety of underlying causes for headaches, including migraine, tension cephalalgia, fluid congestion, and hormonally related syndromes. Sutural immobility seems to be a contributing factor in migraines for many patients. CST addresses this problem, as well as autonomic and neuromusculoskeletal dysfunctions, both of which may be underlying causes of the migraine syndrome.

Pain Syndromes
All pain syndromes, including myofascial, neuromusculoskeletal, and radicular pain syndromes, have shown response to CST. Because of its effects on the autonomics, CST desensitizes facilitated segments and enhances fluid exchange throughout the body and psychoemotional effects. CST also addresses many of the neuromusculoskeletal, myofascial, and psychoemotional factors that may serve as contributing factors to chronic neck and back pain.

Reflexive Sympathetic Dystrophy
Reflexive sympathetic dystrophy (RSD) is a painful condition that results from the sympathetic nervous system going out of control. The cause could be an injury, entrapped nerve, inflammation, toxicity, or any circumstance that might feed an abnormal amount of energy into the sympathetic nervous system. Conservative medical treatment for this condition, which in extreme cases includes amputation of the painful area, has proven rather ineffective. The key to helping the RSD patient is discovering and resolving the underlying source of the excess energy. CST is well suited to finding and treating the underlying causes of RSD and subsequently resolving pain.

Spinal Dysfunctions
Spinal dysfunctions, including scoliosis, low-back (lumbar and lumbosacral) instability, disc compression, postoperative complications, and others, have shown response to CST. Once the underlying cause is determined, CST is effective in solving biomechanical, neurogenic, and facilitated segment problems.

Temporomandibular Joint Syndrome
Temporomandibular joint syndrome (TMJ) is a painful problem caused by the joints of the lower jaw becoming dysfunctional for any number of reasons. Surprisingly, TMJ can originate from a craniosacral system restriction that results in an imbalance between the temporal bones on each side of the head. Other causes include nervous tension that results in tooth grinding and / or jaw clenching, whiplash injury to the neck, or a malocclusion of the teeth. CST is highly effective at locating and alleviating the underlying problems. It is also highly effective at mobilizing temporal bones.

Traumatic Injuries

CST practitioners treat a multitude of traumatic brain and spinal cord injuries, including closed-head injuries, spinal cord injuries, whiplash and other spinal ligament strains, and nervous system sequelae due to injuries. Success varies, depending on the extent and severity of the injury. I usually do well with patients who suffer seizures subsequent to their head injuries, often eliminating the need for further medication. Although a small number of cases do not respond to CST, I have been treating seizure patients since 1975 and have yet to see an adverse reaction.

I have seen moderate improvement in the movement of paralyzed limbs due to head injuries. The greatest improvement usually appears in the area of intellect and social responsiveness. Some patients have had remarkable improvement in vision, hearing, smell and taste, and in secondary autonomic dysfunction such as disequilibrium, cardiac pulmonary function, bowel function, urinary tract function, sexual function, and related conditions. The positive results are probably due to the effect of CST on the autonomics and related spinal cord segments, as well as its ability to reduce stress and anxiety.

Degenerative Diseases of the Central Nervous System

Until a few years ago it was thought that cerebrospinal fluid simply bathed the surface of the brain. All that changed with the use of radioactive tracers that flow with the fluid. It has since been observed that when tracers are injected into the ventricular system of the brain, they are distributed throughout the brain substance within minutes. Since cerebrospinal fluid carries all sorts of messenger molecules that facilitate communications between cells of different systems, it stands to reason that improving cerebrospinal fluid circulation may explain the success seen when CST is used to treat degenerative diseases such as Parkinson’s disease.

Another recent discovery is that cerebrospinal fluid contains molecules that attach to metallic atoms that are deposited in the brain. These metallic atoms are then carried away and excreted from the body in a process known as chelation. Metal atoms deposited in the brain tissue are thought to be contributing factors in problems such as Alzheimer’s disease and senility. Thus the improvement of cerebrospinal fluid circulation through CST may be considered preventive therapy.

Elderly patients who have trouble concentrating and putting words together have responded with increased mental alertness and brain function. By improving the circulation of blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and interstitial and intracellular fluid, CST helps clear toxic wastes accumulated in the brain cells and tissues.

Cerebrovascular Insufficiency Problems

CST has been shown to be effective in both preventing and recovering from stroke when thrombosis or arterial insufficiencies are causative agents. As soon as a patient’s condition has stabilized after stroke and the danger of hemorrhage passes, CST can effectively help wash away toxic byproducts of blood cell deterioration to help enable a speedier recovery.

Postoperative Rehabilitation

CST is an excellent addition to any postsurgical rehabilitation program. It restores the movement of body fluids to areas traumatized by surgical procedures, which enhances the healing process and holds the potential for reducing the formation of adhesions and scar tissue. CST also helps remove residual toxicity of anesthetics and pain medications.

From about 1973 to 1974 I treated several postoperative neurological patients as early as the first postsurgical day with very good results. The neurosurgeon felt these patients demonstrated a decreased number of complications, lowered morbidity rates, and shortened recovery times. In general, the sooner the therapy begins, the better it is at helping to prevent complications.

Brain Dysfunctions

Autism
CST has shown great promise in cases of autism, a complex set of symptoms with no known origin. While it is not clear precisely which mechanisms are at work in either causing or “curing” the condition, it has been widely noted that patients generally inflict much less pain on themselves, display more affection toward others, and show improved social behavior after CST.

Cerebral Palsy
Cerebral palsy
(CP) is a general term that means the brain is not working correctly. Because CST often has a positive effect on the motor control system, including relief of muscle spasticity, we do well with a majority of CP patients. There is occasional remarkable improvement, although sometimes there is little or no change. Either way it deserves a trial of approximately 10 sessions, although the rule holds true—the sooner we treat them the better these patients usually do. For example, if we treat a patient as an adolescent and can correct the underlying problem, the nerve pathways necessary for proper functioning may not be present because they never had a chance to form in the first place.

Learning Disabilities
I have treated a great number and variety of learning-disabled children. In my experience, over half of these children had problems with the craniosacral system. In cases like this, when the problem in the craniosacral system is resolved, the child has up to a 90% chance of overcoming his learning disabilities, especially in cases such as dyslexia and hyperkinesis. Quite often the disability simply disappears.

Motor System Problems|
CST can almost invariably improve motor and speech problems. Even in the case of eye-motor problems, a skilled practitioner can tell in a matter of minutes if the problem is caused by tension in the membranes through which the nerves to the eyes pass. When this is the case, especially in children, the problem can often be permanently corrected in two or three sessions. Surgery for problems such as convergent strabismus (cross-eyed) can often be avoided. Patients treated with CST have also reported great success in cases of olfactory dysfunction and vertigo, although we have seen only moderate success with tinnitus.

Endocrine Disorders

Many endocrine disorders, including premenstrual tension, pituitary dysfunction, pineal gland problems, and related emotional problems, often respond favorably to CST. It enhances the mobilization of fluids and autonomic balancing, improves endocrine control, and relieves neuromusculoskeletal and psychoemotional symptoms. Releasing the dural sleeves that may be restricting nerve outflow to the adrenals, the thyroid, the spleen, the liver, the thymus, and the reproductive glands has also been very helpful in some patients.

Many Other Conditions

The most important thing to remember about CST is that it is extremely gentle and often resolves conditions in a shorter timeframe than many other approaches. Quite simply, it can almost always help in some fashion, even if simply to improve the chance of long-term success of other therapies used.

CONTRAINDICATIONS OF CRANIOSACRAL THERAPY

Even in the most critical cases, CST has wide applications when used in conjunction with conventional treatment programs. However, the following are contraindications for the use of CST13:

  1. Acute intracranial hemorrhage: Affecting the craniosacral system membranes may significantly change intracranial fluid pressure dynamics, which could interrupt the tenuous progress of clot formation and prolong the duration of the hemorrhage.

  2. Intracranial aneurysm: Changing intracranial fluid pressure dynamics could potentially precipitate a leak or rupture of a dangerous, already present intracranial aneurysm.

  3. Recent skull fracture: A very careful approach should be applied in the case of recent skull fracture, lest an increase in cranial bone motion leads to bleeding or a membranous tear.

  4. Herniation of the medulla oblongata: A herniation of the medulla oblongata through the foramen magnum is a life-threatening situation. You would not want to alter fluid pressures within the craniosacral system by any means.
HOW TO LEARN CRANIOSACRAL THERAPY

The Upledger Institute was developed in 1985 to educate the public and healthcare practitioners about the value of CST. Since that time, these techniques have been taught to more than 50,000 therapists in some 56 different countries.

Today the Upledger Institute is dedicated to teaching CST as it was originally developed. Its curriculum offers a full range of workshops totaling more than 500 hours of training.

In addition to providing a sound academic foundation, the training helps therapists develop the subtle senses of touch, motion, and energy perception necessary to become effective CST practitioners. The Upledger Institute also offers a two-level certification program to help ensure the quality of skills.

Because it was originally developed as a complementary modality for healthcare professionals, there is currently no single license to practice CST. Thanks to its rapid increase in practice and acceptance, however, plans are underway to create a separate and distinct professional license program.

PROSPECTS FOR THE FUTURE

Over the last decade, positive clinical results and the public’s growing acceptance of nontraditional healthcare methods have caused a surge in the demand for CST. It is continuing to become well known as an effective facilitator for the inherent healing processes with which every human being is endowed.

Its future in the field of rehabilitative care is bright. Yet its greatest value may be seen even earlier in the cycle of health: in the newborn nursery.19 CST appears to be an efficient neutralizer for all types of birth traumas and their potential effects on the brain and spinal cord, including autonomic nervous function, endocrine function, and immune function. Research strongly suggests that the birth process alone may be responsible for numerous brain dysfunctions and central nervous system problems. CST carried out within the first few days of life could potentially reduce a wide variety of difficulties, many of which might not become apparent until later in life.

CST is also viewed as a successful method of integrating the body, mind, and spirit. This focus on “holistic” health may result in a significant reduction in disease and a great improvement in the quality of life.


REFERENCES
  1. Retzlaff EW et al: Nerve fibers and endings in cranial sutures research report, J Am Osteopath Assoc 77:474-475, 1978

  2. Retzlaff EW et al: Possible functional significance of cranial bone sutures, Report of the 88th session of the American Association of Anatomists, 1975

  3. Retzlaff EW et al: Structure of cranial bone sutures, research report, J Am Osteopath Assoc 75:607-608, 1976

  4. Retzlaff EW et al: Sutural collagenous and their innervation in Saimiri Sciurus, Anat Rec 187:692, 1977

  5. Retzlaff EW, Mitchell FL Jr: The cranium and its sutures, Berlin , 1987, Springer-Verlag

  6. Sperino G: Anatomica humana 1:202-203, 1931

  7. Upledger JE: The reproducibility of craniosacral examination findings: a statistical analysis, J Am Osteopath Assoc 76:890-899, 1977.

  8. Upledger JE: Relationship of craniosacral examination findings in grade school children with developmental problems, J Am Osteopath Assoc 77:760-776, 1978

  9. Woods JM, Woods RH: Physical findings related to psychiatric disorders, J Am Osteopath Assoc 60:988-993, 1961

  10. Upledger JE: Differences separate craniosacral therapy from cranial osteopathy, Massage & Bodywork X(4): 20-22, 1995

  11. Upledger JE: Mechano-electric patterns during cra- niosacral osteopathic diagnosis and treatment, J Am Osteopath Assoc 1:49-50, 1979

  12. Upledger JE, Vredevoogd J: CranioSacral therapy, Seattle , 1983, Eastland Press.

  13. Upledger JE: CranioSacral therapy II: beyond the dura, Seattle , 1987, Eastland Press

  14. Upledger JE: SomatoEmotional release and beyond, Berkeley , Calif , 1990, North Atlantic Press.

  15. Lyttle J: An Olympian comeback, Columbus Monthly 1:105-107, 1996

  16. Murphy J: Olympic diver sinks vertigo with CranioSacral Therapy, Adv Phys Therap 7(42):5, 1996

  17. Bourne RA Jr: To Onar, with love, Massage Ther J 35(2): 68-70, 72,74, 1996

  18. Hammond F: The Upledger Institute offers Russian boy hope for more active life, Nurse’s Touch, 6(2):12, 1995

  19. Frymann VM: Relation of disturbances of craniosacral mechanisms to symptomatology of the newborn: a study of 1,250 infants, J Am Osteopath Assoc 65:1 059, 1966.

TOP